I really dislike Big Brother. I thought it was a questionable format when it first started, but at least an intriguing one. Now, however, as years have gone by, I have become convinced that it's just tawdry, exploitative crud. In actual fact, though, I don't feel the people who take part are the ones exploited - as time has worn on, there has developed a mutual complicity between programme makers and participants - the programme makers have grown to encourage more and more outrageous applications, and the participants have responded to this; self - important publicity hounds with no shame to a man and woman; I feel these guys wish to plaster themselves across prime time television for no better reason than the wish to show off, and that they deserve everything they get.
The people I feel are exploited are the *audience* - why? Because what gets shown to us, masquerading as 'real time' development is, in fact, carefully orchestrated, pre-edited 'highlights' of the day's development...and this is just an excuse to develop 'storylines' about who we should feel sorry for, learn to hate, laugh at etc. In this sense, it's good drama (and the programme makers know this - they're not stupid!), but then why not be honest enough to make a drama in the time slot instead and spare us Big Brother! (Answer: It's a damn sight cheaper to make...etc.)
The one thing I did sometimes watch when Big Brother was on (I haven't done it for a few years now) was the all -night 24 hour coverage (I'm a bit insomniac, you see). And that was (occasionally) very interesting - because you could see what the people were actually doing and saying to one another in between the 'edited highlights'. Generally, it was never very scintillating, but it did teach me that what you see on Big Brother isn't what you got, if you see what I mean! (It was also good character study; I used to watch it with the sound off, just so I could see what sort of movements people casually make with their body language when they are having passing conversations!).