Owning lights

Jason Yip
Director of Photography

I'm just starting out as a DOP, having made a few short films in the past month.

I've noticed in a lot of casting calls for DOP's that ask for someone who owns a camera (which is expected) but also lighting. Is it normal for a camera person to also own and deal with lighting on a shoot? I actually thought that's what a gaffer was for?

It's bad enough getting the right camera equipment (camera, lenses, etc)... but also to own and transport a ton of lighting too? Seems excessive to me. Is this the norm, or are people taking the proverbial pee?


  • 4 years ago
  • 590
  • 3
Andy Feakins
Camera Operator

I’d say taking the pee. Whilst some basic 3 point lighting maybe desirable for any documentary type shoots, you can’t be expected to light a film because as you say, there are other depts for that.


  • 4 years ago
  • 1
User Deleted
This profile has been archived

I have seen a lot of these sort of advertisements. It is very unfair. The rental cost of lights, even a basic set, are way too much. You could ask around and arrange a loan system between a group of Lighting Directors GOP’s. I have a large number of lights that are getting dusty with no use. There must be lights all over the place that are unused. Especially non led’s.


  • 4 years ago
  • 2
You must login as a candidate to participate in the forum.
Please note: Messages written in the forum do not represent the views of The Mandy Network, nor have they been vetted by The Mandy Network staff. If you read something which you believe to be offensive or defamatory, please contact us and we will take the appropriate action.