Drama school is pointless.... (Oh - yes - it - is!)

User Deleted
This profile has been archived

I've never been to drama school. Can you tell?

I thought not.

Before you jump in with the funny comebacks, think about it: is there a guarantee to tell if someone has been through drama school? And I'm talking about the modern 3 year acting degree here, not occasional classes.

If you had to guess which actors on television or film had a degree in acting, I think you're chances of being accurate would be slim. Phil Mitchell (Steve McFadden) has been to RADA, Jack Nicholson didn't.

I wouldn't be surprised if the rise in demand for drama school places has exactly mirrored the rise in demand for Big Brother applications. In fact, the quest for fame has been around for a very long time, and so have the institutions that promise to deliver dreams. And please don't tell me that you're not interested in fame!

The one, tangible, and huge benefit of going to drama school, is the 3rd year final showcase. An opportunity to strut your stuff in front of some industry professionals. But that's it.

Can we really teach people how to 'breathe properly', after 6 million years of evolution? Do we need to learn how to move, when most of us have been doing that without looking like a fraud for all our lives? Should we delve deeply into 'text analysis', when primary school education equips us early on with 'comprehension' basics?

No.

The truth is, acting, an ability to roughly reproduce human behaviour, is something that you either can't do, or can do. Drama school can't turn you from one in to another. If you want an analogy, they can teach you how to polish your existing trophy, but they can't swap your trophy for a different one. Some are naturally gifted, and some aren't. Extremes in nature exist, giants and dwarves, and they're clear to see. Other extremes, like acting talent, are harder to see on the surface, and it's this hidden truth that drama school promises to rectify. But they can't, and they never will.

I wish I had gone to drama school for two reasons. Firstly, to have that 3rd year showcase and nab a decent agent early on. And secondly, so in writing this, I could get less 'How would you know if you haven't been?' replies!

For a long time, the United States shunned the acting degree system, picking stars instead with a much more logical system: how someone looked, or, if they could act already. Now, it seems that they're following the fairly recent British approach of the 'degree in acting'. Not only is this pointless, it's damaging. Three years of an acting degree don't prove you can act any more than a piece of paper (marriage certificate) proves you're in love for eternity!

Don't go to drama school. Get on with it in some other way.

See you at the top!

Paul Khanna


  • 14 years ago
  • 26,739
  • 116
User Deleted
This profile has been archived

Damian,

Chill out.

I'm simply pointing out a personal opinion about drama school.

Anything else is projection, jumping to conclusions, or not getting past some tongue in cheek comments.

If you happen to be drama school trained, I'd have hoped they'd taught you how to interpret text!

:P aul


  • 14 years ago
  • 41
User Deleted
This profile has been archived

Yeah, I second the above, why call it "Drama School Is Pointless" if that isn't what you meant? Should I get you a JCB for that?

And please explain your arrogance in saying about your impending Oscar.

Hilarious! (And before you come back being all clever, your not hilarious)


  • 14 years ago
  • 42
User Deleted
This profile has been archived

Hi Neill,

I never bragged.

It's amusing how you've joined that big line of folk who reacted fiercely to my comments about drama school.

If you don't get the point, even after Jenna's articulate explanation, I'm certain you never will. And why not debate the issue, rather than me?

I used the title 'Drama School Is Pointless....' to generate much needed debate.

Oh, and to personally annoy Damian.

( JOKE :)


  • 14 years ago
  • 43
User Deleted
This profile has been archived

Damian!

Dude, this is a friendly place, and I'm keeping things light before boys get their swords out.

"Drama school won't make you a good actor, but it might make you a bad one."

- Paul Khanna

There's a quote for you. It's my opinion, and that's that.

Paul

p.s.: You mentioned my 'arrogance' about my future Oscar. Isn't that arrogance on your behalf in assuming that I'm being arrogant for predicting one?

p.p.s.: I bet I win two :)


  • 14 years ago
  • 44
User Deleted
This profile has been archived

Well there we have it! The last few postings from Oscar winner Paul just says it all!

It's a small world isn't it when you know someone who works on the crew of Harry Potter!


  • 14 years ago
  • 45
User Deleted
This profile has been archived

Damian,

I think I'll go for a hatrick of Oscar's now, so spread the word!

If only you read my post properly, and did so without prejudice. Yes, I can talk.

Your lack of sensory acuity astounds me. Every actor needs that.

Drama school isn't necessary. Write it on your hand, tell the bus driver, or even call the Daily Mail. It's an opinion concerning the validity of drama school training. There are lots of people who interpreted in the way I intended it to interpreted. That makes it all worth it.

Now I must go and rehearse that winner's speech....

P A U L K H A N N A


  • 14 years ago
  • 46

If you had gone to drama school they would have taught you how Not to mumble


  • 14 years ago
  • 47
Private User
This profile is private

Well, if nothing else, Paul's certainly getting his name and face remembered on the site, which is good networking when all's said and done! And some lively (if not downright ferocious) debate has been sparked, if nothing else...


  • 14 years ago
  • 48

But is this debate healthy? theres no answer to it so we'll just go round and round surely?


  • 14 years ago
  • 49
Private User
This profile is private

Hi, Simon - yes, things are looking that way, sadly. Both camps are sticking resolutely to their guns, and the middle ground's not there for the taking. Not to worry, something else will be along soon to set those keyboards rattling...


  • 14 years ago
  • 50
Private User
This profile is private

Well I think some of you are rising to Paul's comments far too much, and in the process, some of you have turned a potentially interesting debate into a bit of a childish squabble….how old are we?!

Paul you did well with your Harry Potter role....but perhaps learn to be humble within your posts...I am sure you mean to be though, and so i for one give you benefit of the doubt. Also, one can easily be cut from a film....it's happened to me on more than one occasion, and I dare say many more reading this...trust me it can be very grounding when your mates and collegues say..."where were you then?"

I will try and put another point of view to the drama school argument based on my experience, for what it's worth and I am also testing a new keyboard!

I started as an actor 20 years ago. I started late at around 32 but I always set out to treat this as a business with myself as the product….the product simply being "me" a professional actor. If you have a product, you need to sell it, and if you can't make any money from selling it, it's pretty much "professionally" worthless isn't it! Blunt I know…but true I think!

To me, a "successful actor" is one who can maintain a career without depending on other means, Dole, Mum and Dad etc…and only very few actually get to do that. This is something you perhaps need to think about Paul, or at least get accross in your posts….you did well getting a role in Harry Potter, you used your loaf and on this occasion it worked! However, it's the final cut which will show us how good you really are and what happens over the next few years which really counts, but I'm sure you know all of that Sir!

I thought very carefully about Drama school at the start, and quickly worked out what this investment would cost me, and what I would gain from it all. I worked out a 3 year drama degree at a good school, could cost me around 21k in fees, plus loss of earnings of at least another 36k over the three years. Total nearly 60k minus a bit of low paid work at weekends or evenings! Yes yes…I realise some of you got grants etc!

It didn't take a lot of working out! OK so you might think of yourself as being more than just a product, but that's all we are really. This business is 95% selling yourself and 5% working for most of us!! We're nothing special because we are actors are we...especially when we are not working with a degree of regularity?

I can take direction, I can imitate and or become someone else with a change of voice or accent, a change of walk and a clear understanding of the characters emotions and thoughts, or whatever else is needed to play the role convincingly without looking as though I am acting me socks off! Does that make me fully equipped to be a pro actor though? I don't think so!

The only advantage of a good drama school I could see was the repetition of acting and learning with others over such a long period of time? I wondered how much my skill was going to be perfected always acting opposite people who were also learning and in the same boat?

I do appreciate one can study different aspects of various playwrights and differing acting methods. However, is it not the case we all chose a method that suits us best at the end of the day, plus, isn't acting a natural and organic ability and it's real experience which does the proper honing?

The best advantage of all is one gets to perform in a showcase in front of the industry at the end of your course…..but to wait three years for that opportunity without a guarantee of a good agent, was not a sensible choice or financial option for me. I did not want to be an expert in method acting and Shakespeare, only to find I was without an agent at the end of it, and saddled with a huge debt I woudl find hard to reduce. I know that will be seen as a simplistic view…..but is it so far from the truth?

I joined a couple of good extras agencies, which proved to be a good early learning school on film sets, however, I soon learned how disrespected extras..sorry..."Suporting Artistes"... are, and I knew I needed to learn what I could quickly, stop doing it and get a good agent quickly!

I auditioned for 1-2 organised drama showcases, The casting couch was one of the main Showcases at that time, and from that evening alone, I was pleased to be offered places by three agents. I chose my agent carefully, choosing one that suited me and my needs, and it got me started with small featured roles and plenty of adverts in TV and Film all of which had to be auditioned for and won! I do not feel Drama school would have given me such a worthwhile experience.

This enabled me to save a little money to take on some fringe theatre roles and create further awareness of my "product - ME" within the industry. I have to say, I only had very little success, and I soon learnt how Fringe theatre and working for nothing was mostly a fruitless part of the industry. I am not sure that is taught at Drama school...it should be!

With this in mind, I also realised the value and importance of a show reel, and in those days the only option was sending a big VHS tape around. Apart from a few little roles on TV, I added some made up scenes and videoed them as best I could, and farmed the tapes around all over the place. As the internet grew, and editing on PC's became the way to go, I fully capitalised and learned the technology as it became available. To me this was equipping me with proper tools of the industry. A growing collection of TV roles meant I could use those and replace my made up scenes on my reel. Would drama school have taught me any of this I ask myself?

I set up my own team building and Entertainments Company, which was a real financial and self learning help through the varied and extraordinary experiences I have had over the years. If you can win over and gain the attention of corporate clients and audiences at the drop of a hat, you can win over anyone, I assure you! No drama school in the world will give you that experience!

I personally could not see drama school setting me up for heaps of temporary dead end jobs, and constantly awaiting the next very low paid theatre tour, from which I would never have paid off my mortgage. I would probably have to have taken the TIE route of experience, whilst useful; I did not see any real earning potential from TIE. I would have probably not got as good an agent and so on. I thought that was all too risky.

Drama school might be the only option in your eyes, especially if you have worked hard and done three years and got your drama degree. If that's so, that's fine, it suited you and I salute you! However, I wonder if you really think about it, could you not have invested a fraction of the total cost in time and effort and gained more worthwhile experience? Isn't that the centre of this debate?

One can get extra singing, vocal and breathing lessons at anytime without having to stand in front of a drama school board who may or may not give you permission to pay them 3 years worth of fees! One can also take extra specialised courses without disrupting your life over three years, plus you would almost certainly save a small fortune in fees and lost earnings.

These days there is more technical opportunity to get yourself in film online, and drama showcases, or make up your own work to get noticed than ever before. I wonder if Drama school has possibly become more of an ageing tradition than the "only" route to being and maintaining a career as a professional actor, as some on here would have us believe.

I don't denigrate those who feel their drama degrees were the only way to become a professional actor, but I have found it's certainly not the only way of getting oneself into the industry. I have met some superb drama school graduates, but I have also come across many more who despite their training were pretty roppy actors!

How many RADA students are maintaining a career over and above the ones who have given up and whose drama training never achieved any form of living from their 3 years of training?

Surely the simple fact is this, there are no clear cut rules, nor rights and wrongs in this business. What is right for one, might not suit another, but one thing is for certain…. resourcefulness, talent, commitment, business and common sense as well as humility are all very much required, and I am not convinced Drama school can always teach you all, or any of that.

Therefore my advice to any person starting out or thinking of entering this business, is think carefully about what you expect and need from it, study what is really required to be able to survive and get noticed in this business, and perhaps get a training in "those" skills before rushing off with a cheque book to a drama school.

The only exception to all of this is probably Musical theatre, in which it would be vital to have a solid sensible vocal and dance training under your belt, as long as it's a really good school and training module.

There….I don't think I have been rude, or childish towards Drama students and or graduates... just shown they are not always correct in what they say!

I would never be presumptuous enough to say my way is the only way, nor do I think it's always going to be right for everyone, my ramblings are simply based on experience only, and I hope, benefit and generate further debate.

Learn to be humble, because this business will be very humbling at times!


  • 14 years ago
  • 51
Private User
This profile is private

"acting, an ability to roughly reproduce human behaviour, is something that you either can't do, or can do"

Hmmmm . . . not true.

Firstly, 'an ability to roughly reproduce human behaviour' describes only one strand of acting - realism & it's close relatives. There are many more.

Secondly, that type of acting - along with all others - os something that can be improved by praxis. 3 years at a good drama school gives you a lot of time to focus specifically on improving your acting. Spend that long working on your ability to jump, and you'd be jumping higher, faster, further than you would without the training.

But the key fact is, there ARE techniques that will improve your acting (though there may well be some people whose natural acting ability might be inhibitted by too much technique).


  • 14 years ago
  • 52
Private User
This profile is private

"Because acting is subjective so by its very nature success and failure are harder to demonstrate/measure" (Jenna)

Hmmm . . . not true.

We call all spot bad acting, and, even though we won't all agree every time about who the best actors are, it is pretty clear some are better than others. NOT subjective.

Success is also easy to recognise, using Mark's measure in his post above: if you make a living from acting, you are successful.


  • 14 years ago
  • 53
Private User
This profile is private

"So far I see nothing here that cannot be attained without going to drama school just like many business people achieve success without having any formal qualifications (Richard Branson, Alan Sugar etc.)." (Jenna)

These people are notable because they are the EXCEPTIONS.


  • 14 years ago
  • 54

How many of us put credits on their cv that haven't actually happened yet? Only one as far as I can see.


  • 14 years ago
  • 55
Private User
This profile is private

"Previously a university degree was only accessible to the top 10% of the population…now the government want 50% or more of us to have a degree!!! This must mean that universities are becoming less selective about who they take than they used to be especially as there are more places and institutions to study at."

Hmmm . . . not entirely true.

Many people who were capable of attaining a University degree do not attend University for a variety of reasons, most notably socio-economic factors, and the aspirations of those from families that have never been encouraged to believe University is 'for them'. Part of the drive to increase numbers attending University is aimed at overcoming these barriers.


  • 14 years ago
  • 56
James Abbey
Actor

I don't particularly care whether someone is trained or not and I don't particularly care what methods they choose to operate by as the long as the final outcome is Acting and good acting at that. Then fair play to you all however you have got there.


  • 14 years ago
  • 57
Private User
This profile is private

Speaking from personal experience:

I haven't been to drama school, but I have done two short courses at LIPA. The first (taught by Iain Ormsby-Knox and Max Rubin) gave me analytical tools to help with 'motivation', for example, as well as tools to help you unlock your own subconscious.

The second (taught by Abi Langham) focussed on Shakespeare. Again, techniques were taught that really helped us improve our performances.

I don't think there was anyone whose performances did not improve over either of the courses.

I am currently involved in a production of Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are Dead and Hamlet(at the Novas CUC, Liverpool - get tickets now!). Many of the actors are graduates of LIPA. I run out of technique and inspiration quicker than any of them. This is fact, not modesty.

Talent alone, unless it is on the 'genius' level, will not allow you to reach your full potential.

There are very few geniuses.


  • 14 years ago
  • 58
User Deleted
This profile has been archived

"Christine 10" - I encourage you to not make any further libelous or defamatory inferences.

I'm already filming and have not lied on my CV.

If you want the proof, it's also here in blue and red:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1802200/

Retract your defamatory remark immediately.

Paul


  • 14 years ago
  • 59
Hugh Osborne
Actor

Christine wasn't making a defamatory remark, she was merely noting the convention whereby one shouldn't post a credit on one's CV until that credit has been released/screened/staged.

A friend of mine was due to fly out to India for thirteen weeks to film Forster's 'A Passage to India' for ITV. The day before he was due to fly - and after ITV had already spent a fortune in pre-production - Michael Grade decided the whole thing was too costly and pulled the plug.

Aside from the fact that the 'Credits' section of your CV is implicitly entitled 'PREVIOUS Credits', it doesn't do any harm to remember that there's many a slip betwen counting your chickens.


  • 14 years ago
  • 60
This topic has been locked.
Please note: Messages written in the forum do not represent the views of The Mandy Network, nor have they been vetted by The Mandy Network staff. If you read something which you believe to be offensive or defamatory, please contact us and we will take the appropriate action.